Pressure sensor selection must see: how to choose range, medium, output signal?
With the advent of Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems (MEMS) technology, a wide array of pressure sensors with diverse styles and performance capabilities has emerged, catering to a multitude of applications spanning industrial instrumentation, medical monitoring, HVAC equipment, consumer devices, and more. Selecting the appropriate pressure sensor is crucial to avoid incurring unnecessary costs due to underperformance or overperformance based on the specific measurement requirements of the application.

Key Considerations for Pressure Sensor Selection (Integrated Summary)
Material compatibility is foundational, requiring alignment with the operating medium and environmental conditions. For clean air within 0–85°C, board-level sensors suffice, whereas harsh media (e.g., corrosive liquids, extreme temperatures) demand specialized materials like ceramic thick-film or metal thin-film sensors. Applications in seawater environments, for instance, necessitate corrosion-resistant alloys like Hastelloy, while industrial hydraulic systems prioritize rugged materials like 316 stainless steel.
The measurement range must balance nominal operating pressures (optimally 20–80% of full scale) with safety margins to withstand dynamic events such as water hammer or pump surges. For example, sensors in hydraulic systems should tolerate 150% overpressure to prevent diaphragm rupture during transient spikes.
Pressure reference types—absolute, gauge, or differential—must align with the application’s physical requirements. Absolute pressure sensors (referenced to vacuum) suit vacuum chamber monitoring, while differential sensors excel in filter pressure-drop analysis. Gauge pressure sensors, referenced to ambient air, dominate in pipelines and HVAC systems, though small-range applications require careful error management from reference shifts.
Sensor operating principles dictate performance trade-offs. Resistive or MEMS-based silicon sensors offer precision for low-pressure ranges (<1 bar) but lack robustness for high-vibration environments. Ceramic thick-film sensors handle medium pressures (10–600 bar) and aggressive media, whereas metal thin-film variants withstand extreme pressures (>1,000 bar) and temperatures. Piezoelectric sensors are ideal for dynamic high-pressure events (e.g., combustion monitoring) but fail in static measurements.
Output signals and calibration requirements depend on system integration needs. Digital interfaces (I²C/SPI) provide noise-resistant, long-distance communication but require stable power management. Analog signals, though simpler, are prone to voltage fluctuations. High-accuracy applications (e.g., medical devices) mandate factory-calibrated sensors with temperature compensation, while cost-sensitive projects may opt for uncalibrated units with in-house tuning.
Environmental resilience drives packaging design. Miniaturized, unamplified housings reduce failure risks in high-vibration settings (e.g., construction machinery), while high-temperature environments (>150°C) require materials like stainless steel or sapphire. Explosive zones demand intrinsically safe certifications (e.g., ATEX), and humid conditions necessitate IP67+ sealing.
Performance validation hinges on Total Error Band (TER), which consolidates nonlinearity, hysteresis, and repeatability. Industrial sensors typically require TER ≤1% FS, while medical devices demand ≤0.5% FS. Long-term stability must be verified through 2,000+ hours of simulated real-world operation to quantify drift, ensuring reliability over the sensor’s lifecycle.
For our complete selection of sensor solutions, visit aoisensors.com